Next-Generation FN SCAR: Did FN Finally Modernize Its Iconic Rifle?

Quick Answer

The 2026 next-generation FN SCAR is the most substantial commercial update the platform has received in years. FN did not replace the short-stroke piston system or abandon the recognizable SCAR architecture. Instead, it went through the rifle component by component and addressed many of the areas where the commercial platform had fallen behind newer premium rifles.

The redesigned SCAR 16S, 17S, and 20S receive more than two dozen changes. Among the most significant are a lighter two-piece bolt carrier with hydraulic buffering, an extended receiver and integrated M-LOK forearm, updated gas operation, standardized U.S. muzzle threads, forward-venting suppressor compatibility, revised triggers, true AR-pattern pistol-grip compatibility, customizable ambidextrous controls, improved sling attachment points, additional stock options, and retained user-changeable barrels.

FN also says the new rifles were tested through 16,000 rounds without failure of a major component.

Those changes matter because the SCAR enters 2026 in a very different rifle market from the one that established its reputation. Lightweight piston rifles, ambidextrous controls, M-LOK handguards, standardized grips, and suppressor-oriented designs are no longer unusual at the premium end of the market.

FN therefore faces a harder question than whether the new rifle is better than the old one. The more useful question is whether modernizing the SCAR is enough to make a premium-priced SCAR competitive on its own merits rather than relying primarily on the reputation of the name.

Key Takeaways

• FN announced the next-generation commercial SCAR on January 15, 2026, with more than two dozen updates across the SCAR 16S, 17S, and 20S.
• A lighter two-piece bolt carrier incorporates hydraulic buffering intended to reduce the abrupt operating characteristics associated with earlier rifles.
• The extended receiver and integrated M-LOK forearm provide more usable accessory space and additional coverage around the barrel and gas-system area.
• FN redesigned the commercial platform around modern suppressor use, including standard U.S. muzzle-thread patterns and compatibility with forward-venting suppressors.
• The 17S is available in both 7.62x51mm NATO and 6.5 Creedmoor, while the 20S also supports both chamberings.
• The redesign preserves core SCAR characteristics, including short-stroke piston operation, cold-hammer-forged chrome-lined barrels, a monolithic upper architecture, folding-stock capability, and user-changeable barrels.

What Exactly Is the Next-Generation FN SCAR?

The easiest mistake is to look at the 2026 rifle and assume FN performed another incremental SCAR update.

Visually, it still looks unmistakably like a SCAR. The upper receiver, folding-stock arrangement, overall profile, and piston-driven layout preserve enough of the original architecture that there is little question what rifle you are looking at.

Mechanically and ergonomically, however, FN changed systems throughout the rifle.

FN says the redesign grew from both consumer feedback and technical analysis of individual SCAR components. The company specifically identifies shooter experience, reliability, suppressor capability, and adaptability as the primary areas it wanted to improve.

That context helps explain why several of the changes can sound overdue.

The commercial SCAR developed during a period when quad rails, proprietary grip interfaces, relatively limited control customization, and suppressors treated more like optional accessories were normal characteristics of military-derived rifles.

The civilian premium-rifle market subsequently moved toward lighter modular handguards, standardized accessories, increasingly ambidextrous controls, and rifles designed around suppressed operation from the beginning.

The original SCAR did evolve over its commercial life, including the move to a non-reciprocating charging-handle system. What FN had not done until 2026 was reconsider so many of the platform's operating and ergonomic systems at the same time.

The new rifle is therefore best understood as a comprehensive modernization of the existing SCAR architecture rather than an unrelated second-generation rifle wearing a familiar name.

Which SCAR Models Actually Received the Redesign?

The next-generation family consists of updated versions of the SCAR 16S, SCAR 17S, and SCAR 20S.

The SCAR 15P remains part of FN's consumer family, but it was not included in the same broad redesign announcement.

That distinction matters for buyers shopping across the current catalog. The SCAR name alone does not guarantee that a particular firearm incorporates the 2026 updates.

It also creates a relatively clear product hierarchy. The 16S remains the conventional 5.56 SCAR. The 17S continues as the larger-caliber general-purpose rifle while expanding into 6.5 Creedmoor configurations. The 20S remains the precision-oriented member of the family.

The Hydraulic Bolt Carrier Addresses a Core SCAR Characteristic

The most mechanically interesting part of the redesign is the new bolt-carrier assembly.

FN replaces the previous arrangement with a lighter, two-piece carrier incorporating hydraulic buffering. The company describes the hydraulic component as functioning like a shock absorber inside the rifle, reducing felt recoil and helping the firearm remain more settled throughout the operating cycle.

That deserves more context than simply saying the new SCAR has less recoil.

A short-stroke piston rifle uses propellant gas to drive a piston, which transfers energy into the operating assembly. The cartridge itself generates recoil, but the movement and eventual stopping of the rifle's internal operating mass also influence how the recoil cycle feels to the shooter.

The SCAR has historically been associated with a relatively energetic operating cycle, particularly in the 7.62 NATO 17S. The cartridge obviously contributes substantial recoil of its own, but carrier mass and the way that mass accelerates and stops inside the receiver can affect the overall shooting experience.

Reducing carrier weight decreases the amount of reciprocating mass moving through the receiver. Adding hydraulic buffering then gives FN another method of managing how that energy is controlled near the end of the cycle.

The practical objective is not to make a 7.62 SCAR behave like a 5.56 rifle. It is to reduce movement generated by the rifle's operating system beyond what is inherent to the cartridge itself.

FN says the result is significantly reduced felt recoil, greater control, and faster follow-up shots. Those remain manufacturer performance claims, and broader independent testing will provide a better picture of how large the improvement is across ammunition, calibers, and rifle configurations.

What is already clear is that FN identified the SCAR's operating characteristics as something worth engineering around rather than simply treating them as an unavoidable feature of the platform.

FN Finally Gave the SCAR a Modern Forearm

The original SCAR's handguard arrangement made sense when the rifle was developed. It became more difficult to defend as the rest of the premium-rifle market moved toward longer, slimmer modular forearms.

The next-generation rifle uses an extended receiver and integrated forearm with M-LOK attachment positions at 3, 6, and 9 o'clock.

The structure reaches farther forward and gives the shooter additional usable space while covering more of the barrel and gas-system area.

That accomplishes several things at once.

The shooter gains more room for the support hand. Modern rifle technique often places that hand farther forward than was common when many early-2000s military rifles were designed, and a longer forearm gives the user more freedom to establish that position without crowding the receiver.

M-LOK also eliminates the need to surround the entire forearm with permanent Picatinny rail. Picatinny remains useful wherever an accessory actually requires it, while unused sections can remain slimmer and cleaner.

The additional coverage also changes the relationship between the shooter's hand and the gas-system area. That is useful on a piston rifle where components around the gas block can become extremely hot during sustained use.

FN has not removed the SCAR's continuous top mounting surface. Optics and other top-mounted equipment still have a monolithic rail, while the modernization occurs primarily around the sides and bottom of the forearm.

This is one of those upgrades that sounds ordinary precisely because the rest of the rifle industry moved first.

M-LOK is no longer an exotic premium feature. On a rifle in the SCAR's price category, its absence had become more noteworthy than its presence.

Suppressor Compatibility Is Now Part of the Rifle's Design

Suppressor use is another area where expectations have changed dramatically since the SCAR first entered the commercial market.

FN specifically designed the next-generation rifles for compatibility with forward-venting suppressors and revised the muzzle profiles to use standard U.S. thread patterns.

Appropriate 5.56 configurations use a 1/2x28 shoulder, while appropriate 7.62 configurations use 5/8x24.

The standardized threads matter because they broaden muzzle-device compatibility.

The larger change, however, is FN treating suppressed operation as a design consideration rather than an aftermarket problem for the owner to solve.

Traditional suppressor designs can increase the amount of gas and pressure retained in a semiautomatic operating system. Depending on the suppressor and firearm, that can alter carrier speed, increase fouling, and change how aggressively the action cycles.

Forward-venting or reduced-backpressure suppressors attempt to mitigate some of that effect by directing more gas forward rather than allowing as much pressure to influence the firearm's operating system.

FN introduced its own QD556 and QD762 suppressors alongside the redesigned rifles. The company describes them as forward venting, built with 3D-printed Inconel construction, and optimized around both legacy and next-generation commercial SCAR rifles.

FN says each caliber underwent a 10,000-round fully automatic endurance test on a host rifle without failure.

That does not mean owners are restricted to FN suppressors.

The standardized threads are useful precisely because the broader market offers numerous compatible muzzle-device and suppressor systems.

It does mean buyers should understand the difference between a rifle physically accepting a suppressor and a manufacturer designing the rifle's operating system around particular suppressor characteristics.

FN specifically describes the next-generation SCAR as compatible with forward-venting suppressors. Buyers considering other designs should follow the current guidance from both the rifle and suppressor manufacturers rather than assuming every system affects the rifle identically.

The Gas System Was Updated Without Abandoning the SCAR Formula

Underneath the suppressor changes is an updated version of the SCAR's defining short-stroke gas-piston system.

FN retains a two-position adjustable gas regulator while revising the operating system for improved reliability.

Keeping the short-stroke architecture is significant because FN could have used the redesign as an opportunity to move toward a substantially different operating concept.

Instead, it preserved one of the characteristics most closely associated with the SCAR.

In a short-stroke piston system, gas tapped from the barrel acts on a piston for a relatively short distance. That piston transfers energy to the operating assembly rather than routing propellant gas directly into the carrier in the manner associated with the traditional AR-15 gas system.

The practical distinction is not that one architecture is automatically superior.

Both direct-gas and piston-operated systems can produce highly reliable rifles when properly engineered.

The piston arrangement simply gives FN a particular way of managing heat, fouling, and operating energy.

For the new SCAR, the important development is how the existing gas architecture works with the redesigned carrier and suppressor strategy.

Rather than treating them as unrelated upgrades, FN appears to have approached them as parts of the same operating system. Gas drives the piston, the piston transfers energy to the carrier, the lighter carrier cycles, and the hydraulic buffer helps manage the operating assembly's movement.

That systems-level approach is more meaningful than changing the gas regulator alone.

The Controls Are Finally More Configurable

The next-generation SCAR also receives fully ambidextrous and customizable controls.

One of the more unusual details is the selector arrangement. FN offers three selector-lever designs that can be configured into 16 possible combinations.

That allows shooters to tailor the physical interface instead of accepting one factory lever shape on both sides of the rifle.

The broader significance is that ambidextrous operation has become an expected characteristic of many premium rifles.

It obviously benefits left-handed shooters, but it also gives right-handed users more options when manipulating the rifle from unconventional positions or when one hand is occupied.

FN had already moved the commercial SCAR toward greater ambidexterity with its non-reciprocating charging-handle system.

The 2026 redesign extends that thinking across more of the control interface.

True AR-Pattern Pistol-Grip Compatibility Matters

Another seemingly small change has outsized practical value: the next-generation SCAR accepts standard AR-pattern pistol grips.

The legacy SCAR grip interface limited what owners could install without SCAR-specific products or modifications.

The redesigned rifle opens access to one of the largest existing rifle-accessory ecosystems in the world.

For a premium modular rifle, that is considerably more useful than introducing another proprietary FN grip family.

Shooters already know which AR grip angles, textures, sizes, and materials they prefer, and many already own compatible components.

FN therefore improves customization by adopting an established standard rather than creating another one.

That theme appears throughout the redesign.

The SCAR becomes more modular partly by becoming less proprietary in areas where proprietary hardware offered little practical advantage.

The Trigger Depends on Which SCAR You Buy

FN did not use one trigger specification across the entire next-generation lineup.

The SCAR 16S and 17S receive an improved single-stage trigger, while the precision-oriented SCAR 20S receives a new two-stage trigger.

That division makes sense because the rifles serve different roles.

A single-stage trigger can provide a relatively direct and consistent break on a general-purpose carbine. A two-stage design provides a defined initial stage followed by a more deliberate break, a characteristic many precision shooters prefer when building a stable position and preparing a carefully aimed shot.

The previous SCAR 20S already established a strong trigger benchmark.

Earlier versions used the Geissele Super SCAR two-stage trigger, with FN historically listing a 3.5- to 4.5-pound pull on the previous 20S.

That makes the new 20S trigger particularly worth evaluating independently rather than assuming that a new factory specification is automatically an improvement over the outgoing configuration.

For the 16S and 17S, the updated single-stage trigger may be more consequential because trigger feel was one area where some owners of earlier rifles turned to aftermarket parts.

The important point is role differentiation.

FN did not force the precision rifle and general-purpose carbines to use the same trigger merely for manufacturing commonality.

The SCAR Is Becoming More Modular Without Becoming an AR

The 2026 redesign contains an interesting tension.

FN is adopting more industry standards, including M-LOK, AR-pattern pistol grips, and conventional U.S. muzzle threads, while deliberately retaining the systems that make a SCAR mechanically distinct.

That is a logical direction for a mature platform.

Modularity has limited value when it means forcing customers into proprietary components available only for one firearm.

Standardization lets the rifle benefit from equipment the broader market has already developed.

At the same time, turning the SCAR into another AR-pattern rifle would eliminate much of the reason for the platform to continue existing.

FN therefore retains the short-stroke piston system, monolithic upper architecture, folding-stock capability, and user-changeable barrel system while opening other portions of the rifle to more conventional accessories.

The new platform also offers revised sling mounting, multiple rear-stock choices, and Torx-head fasteners.

The barrel system remains particularly important.

FN continues to use user-changeable cold-hammer-forged, chrome-lined barrels, preserving one of the platform's defining mechanical characteristics rather than making the 2026 rifle's adaptability depend entirely on external accessories.

This Is Now Clearly a New Commercial Production Generation

FN's current support documentation provides another clue about how the company views the redesign.

The owner's-manual library now lists a current-production manual specifically covering the SCAR 16S, 17S, and 20S.

The previous SCAR 16S and 17S NRCH manual and previous SCAR 20S NRCH manual are listed separately with discontinued rifle documentation.

That does not mean earlier rifles have stopped functioning or lost factory history.

It does show that FN is treating the redesigned rifles as the current production generation rather than simply a package of bolt-on improvements applied to the previous commercial models.

That distinction may matter to buyers shopping both new and used SCARs because two rifles carrying the same 16S, 17S, or 20S designation can represent substantially different commercial generations.

The 16,000-Round Test Matters, but It Needs Context

FN says the next-generation SCAR was tested to 16,000 rounds without failure of a major component.

That is meaningful because the redesign changes components directly involved in the firing cycle.

A new carrier, hydraulic buffer, and revised gas system need substantial validation if the rifle is going to preserve the SCAR's reputation for high-volume use.

The claim should still be interpreted correctly.

A manufacturer endurance test provides evidence about FN's development and validation process.

It is not the same thing as thousands of independently owned rifles accumulating years of use across different climates, ammunition types, cleaning schedules, suppressors, accessories, and firing patterns.

That distinction is particularly important with the introduction of a hydraulic component.

Long-term commercial use will reveal more about service life, replacement intervals, parts availability, and how the system behaves after years of ownership.

What FN's test does establish is that the redesigned operating system was not treated as a lightly tested prototype feature before commercial release.

For a rifle with the SCAR's reputation and price, that should be considered the starting expectation rather than an unusual bonus.

SCAR 16S vs. 17S vs. 20S

The next-generation changes apply across three rifles, but that does not make the 16S, 17S, and 20S interchangeable.

Each represents a different interpretation of what the SCAR platform is supposed to accomplish, and choosing among them should begin with intended use rather than simply buying the largest available chambering.

The 16S is the most direct choice for someone who wants the SCAR architecture in a conventional 5.56 carbine.

Its challenge is competition.

Excellent 5.56 rifles are abundant, and many cost considerably less than the SCAR 16S. The reason to choose it is therefore not difficulty finding a capable 5.56 carbine. It is specifically wanting the SCAR's construction, piston system, folding stock, barrel architecture, and overall operating design.

The 17S has historically been the model that most clearly demonstrates what makes the SCAR distinct.

It combines larger-caliber capability with a rifle that remains relatively portable for its class. The next-generation operating changes may be particularly noticeable here because improvements to carrier movement and buffering have more opportunity to influence the shooting experience of a 7.62-class rifle.

The addition of 6.5 Creedmoor configurations also broadens the 17S beyond the traditional 7.62 battle-rifle role.

The 20S moves in another direction.

It trades some of the general-purpose character of the 17S for a heavier precision-oriented configuration with a 20-inch barrel and adjustable precision stock.

Buyers considering it should be looking for a semiautomatic precision platform rather than simply a larger or more expensive version of the 17S.

The Price Is Still the Hardest Part of the SCAR Argument

Modernizing the SCAR solves several technical criticisms, but it does not remove the platform's most obvious buying consideration: cost.

Launch pricing places the SCAR 16S at $3,799, the 17S at $3,999, and the 20S at $4,499.

Actual retail pricing can vary, but none of these rifles competes primarily on affordability.

That changes how the SCAR should be evaluated.

At this level, the question is not whether the rifle includes enough features to function well.

Buyers have numerous less-expensive rifles offering reliability, modern accessory mounting, ambidextrous controls, standardized grips, and suppressor compatibility.

Paying SCAR money therefore requires valuing the complete platform rather than adding up individual features and asking whether each one accounts for a certain portion of the MSRP.

That is also why the 2026 redesign matters so much.

A premium rifle becomes harder to justify when the buyer immediately needs aftermarket components merely to bring its basic ergonomics and accessory compatibility in line with newer competitors.

FN has reduced several of those friction points in the new generation.

It has not made the SCAR inexpensive.

It has made the factory configuration more consistent with what buyers should expect from an expensive modern rifle.

Does the New SCAR Offer Better Value Than the Old One?

In one sense, the answer is relatively straightforward.

FN explicitly positioned the redesign around maintaining roughly the same commercial price position while delivering substantially more factory capability.

For a buyer who was already prepared to pay for a new SCAR, that makes the 2026 rifle easier to justify than an older-generation rifle at a similar original MSRP.

The buyer receives the hydraulic carrier, extended M-LOK forearm, standardized grips and muzzle threads, revised controls, updated trigger, revised gas architecture, and suppressor-oriented design without first building an aftermarket shopping list.

That does not automatically make it a better value than every other premium rifle.

The modern market includes extremely capable AR-pattern rifles, piston rifles, and other modular semiautomatic systems that offer different combinations of weight, parts availability, accuracy, suppressor performance, and price.

The value improvement is therefore easiest to defend internally within the SCAR family.

The next-generation SCAR gives someone who already wants a SCAR more rifle for approximately the same class of money.

Who Is the Next-Generation SCAR Actually For?

The clearest buyer is someone who already sees value in the SCAR architecture but hesitated because portions of the previous commercial rifle felt dated.

For that customer, the 2026 redesign addresses legitimate objections without requiring a move to a completely different platform.

It also makes sense for buyers specifically seeking a premium piston-driven rifle with a folding stock, established SCAR operating architecture, user-changeable barrel system, and factory-backed modernization.

Those characteristics collectively create a different ownership proposition from buying a premium AR-pattern rifle and attempting to reproduce some of the same characteristics through accessories.

The harder case is the buyer simply looking for the most capability available per dollar.

The modern rifle market is far too competitive to claim that the SCAR is the only route to a durable, configurable, ambidextrous, or suppressor-capable semiautomatic rifle.

Its price carries a substantial premium, and that premium still needs to be justified by specifically valuing the SCAR platform.

That is ultimately the most useful way to approach the 2026 rifle.

FN has addressed many of the reasons a buyer might previously have rejected a commercial SCAR.

It has not removed the need for that buyer to actually want a SCAR.

Did FN Finally Modernize the SCAR?

Yes, in the areas that mattered most.

The rifle now uses the accessory standards and control philosophy expected from a modern premium platform.

It has a longer M-LOK forearm, genuine AR-grip compatibility, configurable ambidextrous controls, conventional U.S. muzzle threads, a suppressor-oriented gas strategy, an updated carrier, revised triggers, and improved sling and stock options.

Those are meaningful changes rather than cosmetic revisions.

More importantly, FN accomplished them without turning the SCAR into a rifle that merely resembles its predecessor.

The short-stroke piston system remains.

The monolithic upper concept remains.

The folding stock remains.

The user-changeable barrel remains.

The cold-hammer-forged chrome-lined barrel construction remains.

The basic mechanical identity survives even as the rifle adopts more contemporary standards around it.

That balance is what makes the redesign work.

A modernization that erased everything distinctive about the SCAR would have solved the wrong problem.

Final Thoughts

The next-generation FN SCAR is not a reinvention of the platform, and that appears to be intentional.

FN preserved the mechanical identity that made the SCAR distinctive while updating areas that increasingly reflected an earlier generation of commercial rifle design.

That makes the 2026 redesign significant.

The SCAR no longer has to lean as heavily on its history to explain away a dated handguard, restrictive grip interface, unconventional muzzle setup, or limited control customization.

The lighter hydraulically buffered carrier also shows that FN was willing to address the behavior of the operating system itself rather than limiting the project to external ergonomics.

The premium price remains.

That means buyers should still have a specific reason for choosing the platform. There are too many capable modern rifles available for the SCAR name alone to settle that decision.

For shooters who already value the SCAR's piston-driven architecture, folding-stock design, barrel system, monolithic receiver, and overall construction, the new generation presents a substantially more complete factory package.

For everyone else, the real question is whether those characteristics matter enough to justify entering one of the more expensive segments of the commercial rifle market.

FN did not make the SCAR cheaper or turn it into something fundamentally different.

It made the SCAR more relevant to the way premium rifles are configured and used in 2026.

For a platform with more than two decades of development behind it, that may be exactly the modernization it needed.

The next-generation SCAR ultimately shows how much rifle design has changed since the original commercial platform arrived. FN could have responded to modern suppressor use by simply modifying the gas regulator, but the company instead reworked the carrier and recoil system, standardized the muzzle profiles, updated the short-stroke piston system, and developed forward-venting suppressors alongside the rifle.

That approach reflects the larger shift explored in Beyond the Adjustable Gas Block: the best answer to excess gas, recoil, and suppressed operation increasingly comes from treating the rifle as a complete system rather than tuning one component in isolation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 2026 FN SCAR an entirely new rifle?

No. The next-generation SCAR retains the core architecture and short-stroke piston operating system associated with the platform. FN instead made more than two dozen updates across the 16S, 17S, and 20S to modernize their operation, ergonomics, suppressor compatibility, and adaptability.

Which FN SCAR models received the next-generation redesign?

The 2026 redesign applies to the SCAR 16S, SCAR 17S, and SCAR 20S.

The SCAR 15P remains part of FN's commercial lineup but was not included in the same broad redesign.

What calibers are available in the new SCAR 17S?

The next-generation SCAR 17S is offered in both 7.62x51mm NATO and 6.5 Creedmoor configurations.

What is different about the new SCAR bolt carrier?

FN uses a lighter two-piece carrier with an integrated hydraulic buffering system.

The company says the system acts like a shock absorber to reduce felt recoil, improve control, and support faster follow-up shots.

The magnitude of those benefits will continue to become clearer as more independent testing accumulates.

Is the next-generation SCAR designed for suppressor use?

FN specifically incorporated modern suppressor compatibility into the redesign, including standard U.S. muzzle threads and compatibility with forward-venting suppressors.

Owners should still confirm compatibility among the exact rifle, muzzle device, ammunition, and suppressor being used.

Can the new FN SCAR use standard AR-15 pistol grips?

Yes. The next-generation design incorporates true AR-pattern pistol-grip compatibility, substantially expanding the number of grip options available compared with previous commercial SCAR configurations.

Does the new SCAR still use user-changeable barrels?

Yes. FN retains the user-changeable barrel system and continues to use cold-hammer-forged, chrome-lined barrels as part of the platform's core architecture.

How much does the next-generation FN SCAR cost?

Launch MSRPs were listed at approximately $3,799 for the SCAR 16S, $3,999 for the SCAR 17S, and $4,499 for the SCAR 20S.

Actual dealer pricing and individual configurations can vary.

Did FN test the new SCAR to 16,000 rounds?

FN says the next-generation platform completed a 16,000-round endurance test without failure of a major component.

That is manufacturer validation data rather than a substitute for years of independent field use, but it indicates that the redesigned operating components underwent substantial testing before release.

Is the older FN SCAR now obsolete?

No. Previous-generation SCAR rifles remain functional platforms with extensive commercial and service history.

The 2026 rifles incorporate factory changes addressing several areas where the older design differed from current premium-rifle expectations, but existing owners should evaluate those differences against their actual needs rather than assuming an older rifle must be replaced.

About the Author

The ProArmory editorial team includes experienced hunters, competitive shooters, military veterans, firearms instructors, and firearms industry professionals committed to producing accurate, practical, and research-based content.

Our articles draw on manufacturer specifications, current industry information, and real-world shooting experience to help readers make informed decisions about firearms, ammunition, optics, and related equipment.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational and educational purposes only. Product specifications, configurations, pricing, availability, and compatibility can change.

Always follow manufacturer instructions and established firearm-safety practices. Verify current federal, state, and local laws governing firearm ownership, possession, configuration, transport, suppressors, magazine capacity, and use.